Re: [bug-gawk] Execution counts in gawk/master

[Aharon Robbins]

Hi.

> Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:45:19 +0100
> From: Hermann Peifer <address@hidden>
> To: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
> Subject: [bug-gawk] Execution counts in gawk/master
>
> Hi again,
>
> I noted that the execution counts in gawk/master seem to be incomplete: 
> the first count (to the left of the rule) is missing. The one that shows
> how many times the rule's pattern was tested. See below.
>
> Hermann
>
> ### gawk-4.1-stable from git ###
>
> $ ./gawk -V | head -1
> GNU Awk 4.1.1b, API: 1.1 (GNU MPFR 3.1.2-p10, GNU MP 6.0.0)
> $
> $ printf "\n\n" | ./gawk -p/dev/stdout 'NR==1'
>
>       # gawk profile, created Mon Feb  9 19:28:27 2015
>
>       # Rule(s)
>
>       2  NR == 1 { # 1
>       1       print $0
>       }
>
> ### gawk master from git ###
>
> $ ./gawk -V | head -1
> GNU Awk 4.1.60, API: 1.1 (GNU MPFR 3.1.2-p10, GNU MP 6.0.0)
> $
> $ printf "\n\n" | ./gawk -p/dev/stdout 'NR==1'
>
>       # gawk profile, created Mon Feb  9 19:34:18 2015
>
>       # Rule(s)
>
> NR == 1 { # 1
>       1       print $0
>       }

You're right. This is a result of the work done to get comments into
pretty-printing.  This patch fixes your test case.  I expect to push
it out sometime in the next 24 hours.

Thanks for the report!

Arnold
-------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/profile.c b/profile.c
index 233bca0..2cb9e15 100644
--- a/profile.c
+++ b/profile.c
@@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ pprint(INSTRUCTION *startp, INSTRUCTION *endp, bool 
in_for_header)
                                if (do_profile && ! rule_count[rule]++)
                                        fprintf(prof_fp, _("\t# Rule(s)\n\n"));
                                ip1 = pc->nexti;
+                               indent(ip1->exec_count);
                                if (ip1 != (pc + 1)->firsti) {          /* 
non-empty pattern */
                                        pprint(ip1->nexti, (pc + 1)->firsti, 
false);
                                        /* Allow for case where the "pattern" 
is just a comment  */