bug-gawk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bug-gawk] 'Regexp Usage - The GNU Awk User's Guide' international


From: Stefano Lattarini
Subject: Re: [bug-gawk] 'Regexp Usage - The GNU Awk User's Guide' international
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:23:58 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; )

On Wednesday 15 June 2011, Amanda Lynn wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I'm willing to translate page located at 
> http://www.gnu.org/software/gawk/manual/html_node/Regexp-Usage.html#Regexp-Usage
>  
> to the Belorussian language (my mother tongue). What I'm asking for is 
> your written permission, so you don't mind after I'll post the 
> translation to my blog. The translation is intended only for web, no 
> print copies planned.
> 
> Visitors of your website, who come from Minsk (Belorussia) will be the 
> ones, who will read this blogpost, that's the only way to spread them, 
> no additional instruments we can use. Every translation we ever do does 
> not costs a penny for the webpage, which is translated. All we ask is to 
> link back in whatever way you feel confident about it.
> 
> You can leave a voice message and I will call you back, if you prefer a 
> call instead of emails. Do you prefer email or IM for contact (if any 
> questions regarding the translation arise)? What instant messaging 
> client (if any) do you use? AIM, MSN, Skype?
> Thank you!
> 
> Sincerely,
> Amanda Lynn
> +(360) 488-0303
> 
> ---
> This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or 
> proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to 
> which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended 
> recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified 
> that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is 
> prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the 
> sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.
> 
> 
This offer seems suspiciously similar to this one:
  <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-05/msg00027.html>
which apparently turned out not to be a, ehm, genuine one:
  <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-05/msg00041.html>
  <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-05/msg00045.html>

HTH,
 Stefano



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]