[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why is `find -name '*.txt'` much slower than '*.txt' on glusterfs?
|
From: |
Peng Yu |
|
Subject: |
Re: Why is `find -name '*.txt'` much slower than '*.txt' on glusterfs? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 27 Jan 2018 17:45:28 +0000 |
>
>
> glusterfs doesn't provide D_TYPE information:
>
> getdents(4, {{d_ino=10054722685526780333, ..., d_type=DT_UNKNOWN} ...
>
> Nevertheless, it is strange that find calls newfstatat() also
> in the case of "-maxdepth 1" - it shouldn't need to.
Should this be considered as a performance bug of 'find'?
> --
Regards,
Peng
- Re: Why is `find -name '*.txt'` much slower than '*.txt' on glusterfs?, (continued)
- Re: Why is `find -name '*.txt'` much slower than '*.txt' on glusterfs?, Dale R. Worley, 2018/01/20
- Re: Why is `find -name '*.txt'` much slower than '*.txt' on glusterfs?, James Youngman, 2018/01/21
- Re: Why is `find -name '*.txt'` much slower than '*.txt' on glusterfs?, Dale R. Worley, 2018/01/21
- Re: Why is `find -name '*.txt'` much slower than '*.txt' on glusterfs?, Peng Yu, 2018/01/23
- Re: Why is `find -name '*.txt'` much slower than '*.txt' on glusterfs?, Morgan Weetman, 2018/01/23
- Re: Why is `find -name '*.txt'` much slower than '*.txt' on glusterfs?, Bernhard Voelker, 2018/01/24
- Re: Why is `find -name '*.txt'` much slower than '*.txt' on glusterfs?, Peng Yu, 2018/01/24
- Re: Why is `find -name '*.txt'` much slower than '*.txt' on glusterfs?, Bernhard Voelker, 2018/01/27
- Re: Why is `find -name '*.txt'` much slower than '*.txt' on glusterfs?, Peng Yu, 2018/01/27
- Re: Why is `find -name '*.txt'` much slower than '*.txt' on glusterfs?, Bernhard Voelker, 2018/01/27
- Re: Why is `find -name '*.txt'` much slower than '*.txt' on glusterfs?,
Peng Yu <=
- Re: Why is `find -name '*.txt'` much slower than '*.txt' on glusterfs?, Bernhard Voelker, 2018/01/28