bug-dotgnu-libs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug-dotgnu-libs] appoint manicure


From: Dickon Carroll
Subject: [Bug-dotgnu-libs] appoint manicure
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 03:51:30 -0700
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)


But I still call it refactoring!
Do you know what it does?
It means the integration is done on the applications level. This would never happen to me on Windows.
But I still call it refactoring!
Could someone please explain to me what's it all about? Combine the power of unix shell with wide adoption of AppleScript and you can achieve pretty much anything.
I even have a couple of drawers with unmarked hangers and labeled files in them.
How many of you even used your own custom styles? But I still call it refactoring!
I promise it's the last one.
We should learn to depend on our ways more than we depend on our tools. disk-image-udif", "public. Anyway, it all should be working fine now.
disk-image-udif", "public. There could be no single method that works equaly good for everyone and in every situation, though. There could be no single method that works equaly good for everyone and in every situation, though.
Suffice it to say, I had no interest in going out with either one. At least for a little while.
" So, my point is that pretty soon computers will come to be just a little bit better at reading those cues and speech recognition will become ubiquitous. Are we sure that by letting the drug help us fight the illness we haven't robbed our bodies of the chance to prepare itself for the fight against some new quickly mutating virus? We want to make sure that our newly developed ways of dealing with those challenges are simple enough to be easily reproduced.
We should learn to depend on our ways more than we depend on our tools. tar-archive", "org. gnu-zip-tar-archive", "com.
I even have a couple of drawers with unmarked hangers and labeled files in them.
It means you can mix and match and substitute apps to adopt your very own unique style of getting things done.
That's how you learn that people still use those "obsolete" URL's in their feed-readers. Suffice it to say, I had no interest in going out with either one. I don't know about you, but I find myself using TeX more and more often if I need to write a paper.
Maybe with Pandora we can start a new trend of ignoring artist labels and shining the spotlight back on the music. We should learn to depend on our ways more than we depend on our tools.
disk-image-udif", "public.
Feeds require a radically different approach.
Nonetheless, feel free to voice your concerns.
There could be no single method that works equaly good for everyone and in every situation, though. But I still call it refactoring!


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]