[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: GCC 2.8.1 fails to build 3.2.95 (3.2.93 was ok)
From: |
Derks, Victor |
Subject: |
RE: GCC 2.8.1 fails to build 3.2.95 (3.2.93 was ok) |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:21:57 +0100 |
Note:
The INSTALL text of DDD 3.2.95 only recommends GCC 2.95, version 2.7.2 is
the minimum.
Should that line not be updated to indicate that GCC 2.95 is the minimum?
Victor
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Zeller [SMTP:andreas.zeller@fmi.uni-passau.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 10:16 AM
> To: Derks, Victor
> Cc: 'bug-ddd@gnu.org'
> Subject: Re: GCC 2.8.1 fails to build 3.2.95 (3.2.93 was ok)
>
> Hi!
>
> "Derks, Victor" <Victor.Derks@nl2.vdogrp.de> writes:
>
> > Environment:
> >
> > Solaris 2.6
> > GCC 2.8.1
> >
> > Problem:
> >
> > GCC generates errors for constructors which call explicit an empty
> > constructor to initialize a member:
> >
> > XErrorB.h
> >
> > XErrorBlocker(const XErrorBlocker&)
> > : _display(0), _error_occurred(false),
> > saved_active(0), _event() <== _event() IS THE PROBLEM
> > {
> > assert(0);
> > }
> >
> >
> > by removing _event(),_event is a private member of the class of type
> > XErrorEvent which is defined as a struct with no constructor,
> > I could remove the error. The same construction appears also in the
> files
> > DDD.C SignalB.C
>
> Thanks! This will be fixed in the final DDD 3.3 release.
>
> (However, the `INSTALL' requirements will state explicitly that DDD
> 2.95 or later is required, although older GCC versions may work.)
>
> Andreas
>
> --
> Andreas Zeller Universitaet Passau
> http://www.fmi.uni-passau.de/st/staff/zeller/
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This Mail has been checked for Viruses
> Attention: Encrypted Mails can NOT be checked !
>
> ***
>
> Diese Mail wurde auf Viren ueberprueft
> Hinweis: Verschluesselte Mails koennen NICHT geprueft werden!
> ------------------------------------------------------------