bug-cvs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bug-cvs Digest, Vol 52, Issue 2


From: David O'Brien
Subject: Re: Bug-cvs Digest, Vol 52, Issue 2
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 19:38:02 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)

On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 12:01:23PM -0400, address@hidden wrote:
> It does the same thing even without the rm.  Updating to a particular
> revision (whether numeric or symbolic) *always* sets a sticky tag to
> that revision.  What makes you think BASE should be special?

1. Its rather useless if that's proper behavior.
   'cvs up -r BASE' should give you back the same file you had checked
   out - for instance if you hacked the file to pieces and just want
   the original file back.
2. mdb said so.

-- 
-- David  (address@hidden)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]