bug-cvs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Questions: ./config.h.in & ./windows-NT/config.h.in


From: Derek Robert Price
Subject: Re: Questions: ./config.h.in & ./windows-NT/config.h.in
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 08:39:37 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040413

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Conrad T. Pino wrote:

>Hi All,
>
>I'm assuming subject files have a development relationship
>but I'm not clear on just it is therefore this message.
>
>Is one derived from the other?


Kinda.  Right now, config.h.in is autogenerated from the configure.in
script.  We then copy bits into windows-NT/config.h.in as we find we
need them.

>Is there a maintenance or synchronization goal?


I've given it some thought, but haven't done anything about, at least
since some of the GNULIB modules started using AH_VERBATIM.  My
thought was that it might be useful to keep a windows-NT/file with a
list of a #define XXXX YYY style, then generate the
windows-NT/config.h file from that file and the root config.h.in so
that these sort of changes would show up automatically, but I hadn't
gotten around to it.  The same script should probably warn when macros
in the windows-NT list disappear from the root config.h.in.

Derek

- --
                *8^)

Email: address@hidden

Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFApL4ILD1OTBfyMaQRAoCeAKDceqi23CHvmUDzOZ/NAX6l1mbqtACfcYyc
BCGaC7tIxNmLTZsZ6aScF70=
=KgRd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]