bug-cvs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fwd: Re: co -d, modules -d, & Emptydir]


From: Mark D. Baushke
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: co -d, modules -d, & Emptydir]
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:05:20 -0800

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Derek Robert Price <address@hidden> writes:

> Mark D. Baushke wrote:
> 
> > I have a slight bias towards accepting this enhancement. However, I
> > would like to hear what others think of it.
> 
> 
> Since Larry, Mark, and I now appear to mostly agree that this patch
> would be a move towards simplified code and consistent behavior, this
> brings up a secondary question:  Would this be appropriate for stable?

I'd rather see it in feature for arelease or two first before thinking
about pushing it back into stable.

> I was leaning towards feature originally since it does involve a
> behavior change even if it is towards consistency and simplifies the
> source, but the more I have thought about it the more it seems to me to
> be a valid stable fix.

On the other hand, we should also be looking forward to the 'stable'
1.13.x branch which would take the 1.12.x stuff and beat all of the bugs
out of it...

        -- Mark

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFANoSf3x41pRYZE/gRAhbbAKCuq/h59ipNXhfjxsknS5oziYoQLACfboVD
sOu/EeYPVUSqsQooGmq9Hfk=
=jScH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]