[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Case insensitivity ad nauseum

From: Derek Robert Price
Subject: Re: Case insensitivity ad nauseum
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 10:34:39 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1

Hash: SHA1

Jim.Hyslop wrote:

|It sounds like I'm going to be the sole dissenting voice here, at least so
|far. Let me explain my reasoning; it will be rather round-about, but please
|bear with me. It will (I hope) make sense in the end.

[. . . snip . . .]

|It won't be easy, and I'm sure the problem is rather complex, but I truly
|believe the end results *will* be worth the extra effort involved.

Are you volunteering to maintain this code?  I'm getting sick of it.  :)

Seriously, case-philosophies aside, we could remove the handling from
CVS and anyone sharing your beliefs could still install a
case-insensitive file system on a UNIX server and put their CVS
repository there to get the behaviour you want.

As it stands, Windows users will only get the behavior you prefer
_sometimes_, since as long as the repository exists on a case sensitive
file system, files with "conflicting case" can still exist in the

I don't think the overhead for such a small gain, the worth of which is
completely dependant on personal case-philosophy, and which system
administrators can configure according to their own personal
case-philosophy, is worth it.


- --
~                *8^)

Email: address@hidden

Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>!
- --
If virtuous, [the government] need not fear the fair operation of attack
and defense. Nature has given to man no other means of sifting the
truth, either in religion, law, or politics.

           - Thomas Jefferson to George Washington, 1792
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]