bug-cvs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: join not producing conflict


From: Mark D. Baushke
Subject: Re: join not producing conflict
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:20:42 -0700

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Paul Edwards <address@hidden> writes:

> "Mark D. Baushke" <address@hidden> wrote in message news:address@hidden
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > I really want Derek or Larry to look at this and determine if it
> > is a safe patch from their point of view.
> 
> You should always be able to delete a supposed "optimization"
> and the behaviour should be unchanged.  For the same reason
> you should always be able to put a "sleep(1)" anywhere without
> breaking anything.  If something breaks, it is the optimization
> that is incorrect.
> 
> > It would be useful if you could test it to make sure it does the
> > right thing from your point of view.
> 
> Ok, I'll try to test it at work and see how it goes.
> 
> The bugs are gradually being squashed.  It's quite shocking
> that CVS has managed to hide so many bugs for so long!  :-)
> 
> BFN.  Paul.

The only real question in my mind for this patch is if it should somehow
strive to add conflict markers, but I didn't see an 'easy' way to do it.

        -- Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/lInq3x41pRYZE/gRApVBAJ9m5vxbn1CwqqUXvn5+zJlTdjHH2wCfdGm2
mHygqTRdn1RYxSxdtITS4Ps=
=Fwuc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]