[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PAM authentication patch - v2
From: |
Larry Jones |
Subject: |
Re: PAM authentication patch - v2 |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Apr 2003 10:00:09 -0400 (EDT) |
Mark D. Baushke writes:
>
> Actually, I suspect you are mistaken in your assumptions. It is way too
> easy to mount user volumes or NFS filesystems and access the dot files
> in a user tree if you are on a LAN. Storing passwords or non-password
> protected private ssh keys are always to be discouraged.
Note that CVS creates the ~/.cvspass file with the permissions set so
that only the owner has read permission, so having the file on an NFS-
mounted filesystem is no more dangerous than NFS ever is.
-Larry Jones
I always have to help Dad establish the proper context. -- Calvin
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, (continued)
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Mark D. Baushke, 2003/04/17
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Derek Robert Price, 2003/04/18
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Brian Murphy, 2003/04/20
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Mark D. Baushke, 2003/04/20
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Brian Murphy, 2003/04/27
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Mark D. Baushke, 2003/04/28
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Brian Murphy, 2003/04/28
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Derek Robert Price, 2003/04/29
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Max Bowsher, 2003/04/17
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Mark D. Baushke, 2003/04/17
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2,
Larry Jones <=
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Max Bowsher, 2003/04/17
- Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Brian Murphy, 2003/04/18
Re: PAM authentication patch - v2, Brian Murphy, 2003/04/15