[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#15828: behavior of ls -f
|
From: |
Paul Eggert |
|
Subject: |
bug#15828: behavior of ls -f |
|
Date: |
Thu, 07 Nov 2013 12:02:02 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 |
On 11/07/2013 11:57 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> I don't see a need for -f to ignore any -l
One could argue that -f should disable -l
if _POSIX2_VERSION is 200112 or earlier,
I'm not sure it's worth the hassle to
implement that, though.