[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k
From: |
Linda Walsh |
Subject: |
bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k? |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Jun 2013 18:25:11 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird |
Eric Blake wrote:
If you think there is an extension
> missing in ls to display something that you need, feel free to write a
> patch to provide that extension
====
Actually it's a desire to have what Used to be there before...
Astarte:law> ll *.iso
-rw-rw-r-- 1 734646272 2011-01-13 07:45 OMSA64-CentOS55-x86_64-LiveCD.iso
^^ size in bytes...
Astarte:law> ll -k *.iso
-rw-rw-r-- 1 717428 2011-01-13 07:45 OMSA64-CentOS55-x86_64-LiveCD.iso
^^ size in K....
Astarte:law> ll --block-size=M *.iso
-rw-rw-r-- 1 701M 2011-01-13 07:45 OMSA64-CentOS55-x86_64-LiveCD.iso
^^^ and size in Megabytes -- even with the 'M'...
I could send you a patch from 7.1, but you probably already have
a more recent version that doesn't have functionality removed?
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Linda Walsh, 2013/06/01
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Pádraig Brady, 2013/06/01
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Linda A. Walsh, 2013/06/01
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/01
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Linda Walsh, 2013/06/01
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Eric Blake, 2013/06/01
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?,
Linda Walsh <=
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/02
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Linda Walsh, 2013/06/02
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Eric Blake, 2013/06/04
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Linda Walsh, 2013/06/06