On 01/09/2013 11:01 AM, Erik Auerswald wrote:
Hi,
On 01/09/2013 11:34 AM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
On 01/09/2013 11:14 AM, Marcel Böhme wrote:
There are the following problems with the -w parameter of the seq tool:
[...]
Hmm, according to the TEXI manual, the FIRST number should also use
a fixed point decimal representation when the -w option is used:
[...]
But that leaves the question open if there's a reason for this.
I.e. if it's just documented behavior, a requirement of some
standard or due to compatibility reasons.
That seems to be just documented behavior, since seq is not
standardized by POSIX and other seq implementations ([1],[2],[3])
don't document this. On the contrary, a common example is 'seq -w 0
.05 .1'.
This example works fine with GNU seq:
$ seq -w 0 .05 .1
0.00
0.05
0.10
Even when counting to negative numbers:
$ seq -w 0 -.05 -.1
00.00
-0.05
-0.10
Starting with a negative number with a fractional step size breaks
equal width for non-negative numbers:
$ seq -w -1 .5 1
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
$ seq --version | head -n1
seq (GNU coreutils) 8.13
Looks like a bug. I'll fix with:
diff --git a/src/seq.c b/src/seq.c
index e1b467c..3eb53f8 100644
--- a/src/seq.c
+++ b/src/seq.c
@@ -332,6 +332,8 @@ get_default_format (operand first, operand step,
operand last)
last_width--; /* don't include space for '.' */
if (last.precision == 0 && prec)
last_width++; /* include space for '.' */
+ if (first.precision == 0 && prec)
+ first_width++; /* include space for '.' */
size_t width = MAX (first_width, last_width);
if (width <= INT_MAX)
{