|
| From: | Eric Blake |
| Subject: | bug#9277: cp |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:14:27 -0600 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110621 Fedora/3.1.11-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.11 |
[re-adding the list again - there's a reason that we prefer public lists] On 08/10/2011 04:07 PM, vesselin kavalov wrote:
Hi Eric, yes, I can do SHA, but on the real file contents only! That's why I hate soft links! because everything may stay the same, but a change of where a soft link points to is undetectable and U get different results of subsequent compiles. I probably will go brute force and set restrictive unix permissions on a different user and group ownership.
You can do SHA on symlink contents, by using readlink on those symlinks. Your claim that symlink changes are undetectable is bogus.
-- Eric Blake address@hidden +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |