[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils
From: |
C de-Avillez |
Subject: |
Re: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:43:30 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8pre) Gecko/20100107 Shredder/3.0.1pre |
On 01/07/10 12:52, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
>> Sorry, but this is a developer tool
>>
> Despite of the language such a util is written in, I was
> wondering if it's really only a developer tool? Aren't there enough
> programs out there that do not ever print their errors correctly?
> No question that this would be a bad style, but nevertheless, it
> isn't rarely.
>
Indeed. I usually float between different customers, with different *IX
brands -- of course, not all of them use coreutils, but that's life. Not
all of them deploy PERL, or Python, or MySQL (which provides 'perror'
for that).
But, if I could rely on all that deploy coreutils to have something like
that it would make my life much more simpler.
Of course, it can still be a contrib-type of thing -- but it would be there.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature