bug-coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils


From: C de-Avillez
Subject: Re: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:43:30 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8pre) Gecko/20100107 Shredder/3.0.1pre

On 01/07/10 12:52, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
>> Sorry, but this is a developer tool
>>     
> Despite of the language such a util is written in, I was
> wondering if it's really only a developer tool? Aren't there enough
> programs out there that do not ever print their errors correctly?
> No question that this would be a bad style, but nevertheless, it
> isn't rarely.
>   

Indeed. I usually float between different customers, with different *IX
brands -- of course, not all of them use coreutils, but that's life. Not
all of them deploy PERL, or Python, or MySQL (which provides 'perror'
for that).

But, if I could rely on all that deploy coreutils to have something like
that it would make my life much more simpler.

Of course, it can still be a contrib-type of thing -- but it would be there.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]