[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: stat vs. "-"
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: stat vs. "-" |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:04:51 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net> writes:
> > But how would you make it work *with* -f? You don't know the path of the
> > file used to create stdin (and in the case of a pipe, there is no path),
>
> There is no need for an actual file name, since fstatfs
> takes a file descriptor. Of course, there's the issue
> that some systems don't have a usable fstatfs...
Or fstatvfs, if you go by POSIX. I stand corrected; it looks like we _can_ try
to implement 'stat -f -', so I agree that we ought to do so for the consistency
aspect. I'm okay with failing with ENOSYS or ENOTSUP on platforms that lack a
working fstat[v]fs.
--
Eric Blake