[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AW: dd killed with USR1 right after ftruncate()
From: |
Voelker, Bernhard |
Subject: |
AW: dd killed with USR1 right after ftruncate() |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:14:43 +0200 |
Pádraig wrote:
> What is your exact dd command please, and destination file system.
I was running KNOPPIX 5.3.1; the source was a harddisk partition, and
the target was a file in an ext2 filesystem on a harddisk in an USB device
mounted on /media/sdb2/:
$ dd if=/dev/sda5 of=/media/sdb2/backups/sda5 bs=1G
> I'm a bit confused as ftruncate is not called unless you specify a
> non zero seek= but that seems a bit weird from your described usage.
hmm, so maybe it has not actually been the truncate() which took
so long but the fd_reopen() using O_TRUNC.
Have a nice day,
Berny
- dd killed with USR1 right after ftruncate(), Voelker, Bernhard, 2009/08/12
- Re: dd killed with USR1 right after ftruncate(), Pádraig Brady, 2009/08/13
- AW: dd killed with USR1 right after ftruncate(),
Voelker, Bernhard <=
- Re: AW: dd killed with USR1 right after ftruncate(), Jim Meyering, 2009/08/13
- Re: AW: dd killed with USR1 right after ftruncate(), Pádraig Brady, 2009/08/13
- AW: AW: dd killed with USR1 right after ftruncate(), Voelker, Bernhard, 2009/08/13
- Re: AW: AW: dd killed with USR1 right after ftruncate(), Pádraig Brady, 2009/08/13
- Re: AW: AW: dd killed with USR1 right after ftruncate(), Jim Meyering, 2009/08/13
- Re: AW: dd killed with USR1 right after ftruncate(), Jim Meyering, 2009/08/13