Re: bug in ls -1U: argument files printed after their contents

[Jim Meyering]

Kamil Dudka wrote:

> Hi Jim,
>
> On Sat July 25 2009 16:36:13 Jim Meyering wrote:
>> In the mean time, I've written a test for this.
>> Along the way, I noticed that ls -UR1 no longer works the
>> way I would expect, since the -R is effectively ignored.
>> This suggests that we may want to disable the optimization also
>> when -R is specified.
>
> I've decided to make a trade-off. The optimization now works correctly when
> more directories are given as ls' arguments, but it is bypassed when -R
> or -s option is used. The patch should be applied on top of yours.
>
> Please prioritize review of this bug fix if possible. I am leaving for
> vacation tomorrow, far from internet. Thanks in advance!

Thanks.
That is reasonable.
I've juggled our patches a little so that your
fix comes before the test (so as not to hinder bisection)
and has the NEWS entry.

Have a nice vacation.