|
From: | Philip Rowlands |
Subject: | Re: copyright years: mass-update every January 1 |
Date: | Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:45:03 +0100 (BST) |
User-agent: | Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) |
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
It doesn't affect it at all, if you use a version of coreutils from 1980, then the copyright term will be from that date. If you use a version from 2100 then it will be from that date.
OK, but taken separately the files have/had dates to indicate the most recent amendment. I'm curious whether the "slavish copying" (to use a phrase from a relevant case) of old to new file, updating only the date, contributes sufficient originality to defend the change in public-domain date.
Just trying to illustrate the point here; I don't intend to start a long thread, merely taking an interest in clarity of copyright terms/expiry in general.
Cheers, Phil
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |