[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sort order changed in "sort" and "ls".
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
Subject: |
Re: sort order changed in "sort" and "ls". |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:50:44 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071008) |
Rogier Wolff wrote:
> Dear coreutils-developers,
>
> I just noticed that ls sorted my directory in an unusual way. I was
> writing up a bugreport, and was saying: It's odd that ls would sort
> differently than "sort" would, and found out that sort has been
> changed as well.
>
> Sort has an option to trigger the observed behaviour: -f.
>
> This works on an older instance of "sort" that I found, which was
> compiled by debian in 2004.
[snip]
> P.S. It seems my shell is similarly broken.
I'm guessing your locale changed? Details in the FAQ:
http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/coreutils-faq.html#Sort-does-not-sort-in-normal-order_0021
- sort order changed in "sort" and "ls"., Rogier Wolff, 2009/03/10
- Re: sort order changed in "sort" and "ls"., Eric Blake, 2009/03/10
- Re: sort order changed in "sort" and "ls"., Rogier Wolff, 2009/03/10
- Re: sort order changed in "sort" and "ls"., Eric Blake, 2009/03/12
- Re: sort order changed in "sort" and "ls"., Rogier Wolff, 2009/03/13
- Re: sort order changed in "sort" and "ls"., Bob Proulx, 2009/03/13
- Re: sort order changed in "sort" and "ls"., Eric Blake, 2009/03/13
- Re: sort order changed in "sort" and "ls"., Bob Proulx, 2009/03/13
Re: sort order changed in "sort" and "ls".,
Pádraig Brady <=