[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
Subject: |
Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail? |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:32:51 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071008) |
Karl Berry wrote:
> It's probably useful to add this functionality to all coreutil filters.
>
> Wouldn't it suffice to add buffer control options to cat, rather than
> every program?
Unfortunately it's the middle of the pipeline that usually causes
the buffering issues and so sticking a cat --un-buffered or whatever
before of after a command will not suffice.
> I still need to be convinced that glibc is not the correct place for
> this. If it was there then any users of stdio could be controlled.
>
> Maybe so, but the chances of any such change actually getting into glibc
> seem rather small in practice to me. Maybe a gnulib module, if someone
> is volunteering to write the code :).
Should be easy enough.
I've already done the code, but I'm not sure about using
environment variables for the interface.
Need to think about it a bit more...
cheers,
Pádraig.
- Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, David Corlette, 2008/11/20
- Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/11/20
- Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/20
- Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Brian Dessent, 2008/11/20
- Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/21
- Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Reuben Thomas, 2008/11/21
- Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/11/21
- Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Andreas Schwab, 2008/11/21
- Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/21
- Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/22
- Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/22
- Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/22
- Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Brian Dessent, 2008/11/22