[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesyst
From: |
James Youngman |
Subject: |
Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems? |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:40:28 +0000 |
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Phillip Susi <address@hidden> wrote:
> James Youngman wrote:
>>
>> This version should be race-free:
>>
>> find -type f -print0 |
>> xargs -0 -n 8 --max-procs=16 md5sum >> ~/md5sums 2>&1
>>
>> I think that writing into a pipe should be OK, since pipes are
>> non-seekable. However, with pipes in this situation you still have a
>> problem if processes try to write more than PIPE_BUF bytes.
>
> You aren't using a pipe there.
I know this. My point was that >> ensures that the file is opened in
O_APPEND mode, but that the equivalent xargs command with a pipe
instead of a file redirection is safe.
> What you are doing is having the shell open
> the file, then the md5sum processes all inherit that fd so they all share
> the same offset. As long as they write() the entire line at once, the file
> pointer will be updated atomically for all processes and the lines from each
> process won't clobber each other.
>
>
- Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, Andrew McGill, 2008/11/08
- Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/08
- Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, James Youngman, 2008/11/08
- Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, Andrew McGill, 2008/11/11
- Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, James Youngman, 2008/11/12
- Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, Phillip Susi, 2008/11/12
- Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?,
James Youngman <=
- Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/11/13
- Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, Andrew McGill, 2008/11/14
- Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, James Youngman, 2008/11/15
Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2008/11/09