[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] df: new option: --total (-c) to produce grand total (in the
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] df: new option: --total (-c) to produce grand total (in the same way as du) |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Sep 2008 09:38:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-07-21) |
Hello,
> Bruno Haible <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Jim Meyering wrote:
> >
> >>> Some of the changes (& => &&) are unconditional improvements, imho.
> >
> > I disagree. The & => && change inserts a conditional branch into the control
> > flow, with the potential to save a single memory access. I count ca. 2 CPU
> > cycles for a memory access and ca. 8 CPU cycles for a conditional jump,
> > therefore I would say that the change slows down the program a bit.
For what little it's worth, this code cycle argument does not take into
account the optimization features of recent GCC versions AFAIK.
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: [PATCH] df: new option: --total (-c) to produce grand total (in the same way as du), (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] df: new option: --total (-c) to produce grand total (in the same way as du), Andreas Schwab, 2008/09/03
- Re: [PATCH] df: new option: --total (-c) to produce grand total (in the same way as du), Jim Meyering, 2008/09/03
- Re: [PATCH] df: new option: --total (-c) to produce grand total (in the same way as du), Andreas Schwab, 2008/09/03
- Re: [PATCH] df: new option: --total (-c) to produce grand total (in the same way as du), Jim Meyering, 2008/09/03
- Re: [PATCH] df: new option: --total (-c) to produce grand total (in the same way as du), Andreas Schwab, 2008/09/03
Re: [PATCH] df: new option: --total (-c) to produce grand total (in the same way as du), Kamil Dudka, 2008/09/03
Re: [PATCH] df: new option: --total (-c) to produce grand total (in the same way as du), Eric Blake, 2008/09/03