[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: horrible utf-8 performace in wc
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: horrible utf-8 performace in wc |
Date: |
Wed, 07 May 2008 14:53:14 +0200 |
Bo Borgerson <address@hidden> wrote:
> I may be misinterpreting your patch, but it seems to me that
> decrementing count for zero-width characters could potentially lead to
> confusion. Not all zero-width characters are combining characters, right?
It looks ok to me, since there's an unconditional increment
chars++;
about 25 lines above, so the decrement would just undo that.
- horrible utf-8 performace in wc, Jan Engelhardt, 2008/05/06
- Re: horrible utf-8 performace in wc, Pádraig Brady, 2008/05/07
- Re: horrible utf-8 performace in wc, Bo Borgerson, 2008/05/07
- Re: horrible utf-8 performace in wc,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: horrible utf-8 performace in wc, Bo Borgerson, 2008/05/07
- Re: horrible utf-8 performace in wc, Pádraig Brady, 2008/05/07
- Re: horrible utf-8 performace in wc, Bo Borgerson, 2008/05/07
- Re: horrible utf-8 performace in wc, Pádraig Brady, 2008/05/07
- Re: horrible utf-8 performace in wc, Bo Borgerson, 2008/05/08
- Re: horrible utf-8 performace in wc, Bruno Haible, 2008/05/08
- Re: horrible utf-8 performace in wc, Pádraig Brady, 2008/05/07
- Re: horrible utf-8 performace in wc, Bruno Haible, 2008/05/08
Re: horrible utf-8 performace in wc, Jan Engelhardt, 2008/05/07
Re: horrible utf-8 performace in wc, Jim Meyering, 2008/05/07