bug-coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: coreutils and xattr


From: Mike Frysinger
Subject: Re: coreutils and xattr
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:02:09 -0400
User-agent: KMail/1.9.7

On Sunday 20 April 2008, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 April 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> On Sunday 20 April 2008, Jim Meyering wrote:
> >> > Mike Frysinger <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> > > has work on merging Andreas' patch just stalled ?  that and the big
> >> > > nasty i18n patch are about the only thing i carry in Gentoo anymore
> >> > > as everything else has been merged ...
> >> >
> >> > I haven't looked at any xattr-related changes for a long time.
> >> > Do you know if there are other variants of that patch (probably),
> >> > and if so, how they differ?
> >>
> >> so we know we're talking about the same thing, i think you're referring
> >> to the patch as you cited in an old e-mail and found here:
> >> http://www.suse.de/~agruen/coreutils/5.91/
> >>
> >> the patch has been updated in opensuse since (i'm attaching the latest
> >> one i can find from their coreutils-6.9-43 version).  the only thing i
> >> have in Gentoo beyond this patch is to add AC_ARG_ENABLE(xattr) support.
> >
> > hmm, you probably want one that applies nicely ;)
>
> Thank you.
> That's a good first step.
>
> > here is the Gentoo version which applies to 6.11
>
> Hmmm...
> I applied the patch and tried to build/compile.  No go:
>
>   copy.c: In function 'copy_xattr_filter':
>   copy.c:191: warning: implicit declaration of function 'attr_copy_action'
>   copy.c:192: error: 'ATTR_ACTION_SKIP' undeclared (first use in this
> function) copy.c:192: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only
> once copy.c:192: error: for each function it appears in.)
>   copy.c:194: error: 'ATTR_ACTION_PERMISSIONS' undeclared (first use in
> this function)
>
> So maybe another patch is required?

i researched it and opensuse applies a custom patch to their attr package 
which creates a new function / enum and coreutils leverages that (which makes 
for the coreutils code to be much simpler).  no idea what Andreas' intentions 
are here though as i cant seem to find any mention with upstream attr and 
these changes.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]