[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Command line parsing of ls, tail and wc with genparse
|
From: |
Jim Meyering |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Command line parsing of ls, tail and wc with genparse |
|
Date: |
Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:35:29 +0200 |
Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> wrote:
> address@hidden (Michael Geng) writes:
>
>> Is there a special reason why you use fprintf (... , stdout) and
>> fputs (stdout, ...) instead of printf and puts?
>
> Note that fputs (stdout) and puts are not the same.
Good point.
I'll bet that was why I chose to use the former.
Re: [PATCH] Command line parsing of ls, tail and wc with genparse, Jim Meyering, 2007/10/06
- Re: [PATCH] Command line parsing of ls, tail and wc with genparse, Michael Geng, 2007/10/07
- Re: [PATCH] Command line parsing of ls, tail and wc with genparse, Michael Geng, 2007/10/09
- Re: [PATCH] Command line parsing of ls, tail and wc with genparse, Jim Meyering, 2007/10/09
- Re: [PATCH] Command line parsing of ls, tail and wc with genparse, Andreas Schwab, 2007/10/09
- Re: [PATCH] Command line parsing of ls, tail and wc with genparse,
Jim Meyering <=