[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: coreutils-6.9 and Tru64 UNIX 5.1 FFM mounts
|
From: |
Albert Chin |
|
Subject: |
Re: coreutils-6.9 and Tru64 UNIX 5.1 FFM mounts |
|
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jul 2007 07:52:11 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 01:00:07PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
>
> So, looks like we don't want STAT_STATVFS on this platform. Maybe we
> should check for STAT_STATFS3_OSF1 first in m4/fsusage.m4 before
> STAT_STATVFS?
Does this sound like an acceptable solution?
--
albert chin (address@hidden)
- coreutils-6.9 and Tru64 UNIX 5.1 FFM mounts, Albert Chin, 2007/07/05
- Re: coreutils-6.9 and Tru64 UNIX 5.1 FFM mounts, James Youngman, 2007/07/06
- Re: coreutils-6.9 and Tru64 UNIX 5.1 FFM mounts, Albert Chin, 2007/07/06
- Re: coreutils-6.9 and Tru64 UNIX 5.1 FFM mounts, Albert Chin, 2007/07/06
- Re: coreutils-6.9 and Tru64 UNIX 5.1 FFM mounts, Jim Meyering, 2007/07/06
- Re: coreutils-6.9 and Tru64 UNIX 5.1 FFM mounts, Albert Chin, 2007/07/09
- Re: coreutils-6.9 and Tru64 UNIX 5.1 FFM mounts,
Albert Chin <=
- Re: coreutils-6.9 and Tru64 UNIX 5.1 FFM mounts, Jim Meyering, 2007/07/12
- Re: coreutils-6.9 and Tru64 UNIX 5.1 FFM mounts, Albert Chin, 2007/07/12
- Re: coreutils-6.9 and Tru64 UNIX 5.1 FFM mounts, Jim Meyering, 2007/07/13
- Re: coreutils-6.9 and Tru64 UNIX 5.1 FFM mounts, Albert Chin, 2007/07/13
- Re: coreutils-6.9 and Tru64 UNIX 5.1 FFM mounts, Jim Meyering, 2007/07/13