[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default number of overwrites in shred
From: |
Peter Eckersley |
Subject: |
Re: Default number of overwrites in shred |
Date: |
Fri, 04 May 2007 15:48:51 +0000 |
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 10:28 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> Jim Meyering scripsit:
>
> > My reflex was to object. Reducing the default number of passes from
> > 25 to 1 seemed extreme. But after skimming through the link below,
> > it's hard to argue :-)
>
> Still, there may be older disks hanging about. How about making the
> number of passes inversely proportional to the log of the size of
> the disk? That will smoothly accommodate older disks with wide
> recording tracks as well as newer ones with narrow tracks.
>
If there are portable ways of doing this sort of thing, sure.
Also, it would be a good idea to check whether the underlying device is
a disk at all. Different overwrite protocols might be required for
flash and other media...
--
Peter Eckersley address@hidden
Staff Technologist Tel +1 415 436 9333 x131
Electronic Frontier Foundation Fax +1 415 436 9993
- Re: Default number of overwrites in shred, (continued)
- Re: Default number of overwrites in shred, Jim Meyering, 2007/05/04
- Re: Default number of overwrites in shred, Peter Eckersley, 2007/05/04
- Re: Default number of overwrites in shred, Jim Meyering, 2007/05/04
- Re: Default number of overwrites in shred, Paul Eggert, 2007/05/04
- Re: Default number of overwrites in shred, Jim Meyering, 2007/05/04
- Re: Default number of overwrites in shred, Peter Eckersley, 2007/05/04
- Re: Default number of overwrites in shred, Philip Rowlands, 2007/05/05
- Re: Default number of overwrites in shred, Pádraig Brady, 2007/05/06
- Re: Default number of overwrites in shred, Paul Eggert, 2007/05/08
- Re: Default number of overwrites in shred, John Cowan, 2007/05/04
- Re: Default number of overwrites in shred,
Peter Eckersley <=