bug-coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: configure: error: ... list of mounted file systems


From: Matthew Woehlke
Subject: Re: configure: error: ... list of mounted file systems
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:52:40 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061025 Thunderbird/1.5.0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0

Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Hello, bug-coreutils,

coreutils-6.7/configure is failing on z/OS v1r7:
[snip]
checking for listmntent... no
checking for getmntinfo... no
checking for sys/ucred.h... yes
checking for sys/mount.h... (cached) yes
checking mntent.h usability... yes
checking mntent.h presence... no
checking for mntent.h... no
checking for sys/fs_types.h... (cached) no
checking for struct fsstat.f_fstypename... no
checking for library containing getmntent... no
checking for getmntent... no
checking for listmntent of Cray/Unicos-9... no
checking for mntctl function and struct vmount... no
checking for getfsstat function... no
checking for FIXME existence of three headers... no
checking for getmntinfo function... no
checking for getmnt function... no
checking for next_dev... no
checking for fs_stat_dev... no
checking fs_info.h usability... yes
checking fs_info.h presence... no
checking for fs_info.h... no
checking for BEOS mounted file system support functions... no
checking whether it is possible to resort to fread on /etc/mnttab... no
configure: error: could not determine how to read list of mounted file systems

Any suggestion for circumventing this?  I really only want to build
md5sum.

On the last at-least-two platforms (NSK and Interix) where I have had to fix configure so this was a non-fatal error (note: you will also have to fix Makefile to not build things like du that need the fs list), I just edited configure to make this test non-fatal. Look for 'could not determine ...' and change the script to remove the exit's when this happens.

Can we please get this fixed, someone? We're up to at-least-three platforms this affects.

--
Matthew
What? This signature /again/?





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]