[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: logical paths
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: logical paths |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Sep 2006 15:36:46 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
"Kartik K. Agaram" <address@hidden> writes:
> just giving coreutils such options would
> get this leaky abstraction most of the way there.
> I will submit patches in a bit.
".." occurs in a lot of places. Will those patches put a wrapper
around every system call that uses a file name? And what, exactly,
will that wrapper do?
Will the patch add a new option to every coreutils command that uses
file names? That sounds pretty intrusive.
- (no subject), Kartik K. Agaram, 2006/09/09
- logical paths [was: (no subject)], Eric Blake, 2006/09/09
- logical paths (was: (no subject)), Bob Proulx, 2006/09/09
- Re: logical paths (was: (no subject)), Thomas Schwinge, 2006/09/09
- Re: logical paths, Kartik K. Agaram, 2006/09/09
- Re: logical paths,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: logical paths, Kartik K. Agaram, 2006/09/10
- Re: logical paths, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/10
- Re: logical paths, Kartik K. Agaram, 2006/09/10
- Re: logical paths, Eric Blake, 2006/09/11
- Re: logical paths, Kartik K. Agaram, 2006/09/11