[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re2: coreutils v5.2.1 - stat.c
|
From: |
Bob Proulx |
|
Subject: |
Re: Re2: coreutils v5.2.1 - stat.c |
|
Date: |
Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:00:21 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> ThMO <address@hidden> writes:
> > ยท NEWS:
> > why is the above bug, which I reported, *not* listed within the
> > NEWS file, clearly stated as a fixed bug?
>
> NEWS reports only important user-visible fixes. I don't know which
> bug you meant by "the above bug". If we forgot to put a bugfix in
> NEWS and it's important please tell it what it was.
I could not find a NEWS entry on this item either. This is a
significant enough item that I think it should have one. After I
responded to Tom and the list I posted this note as a followup to the
bug-coreutils list only. It seemed germane only to the coreutils
developers on the list and so that is where I directed it.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-09/msg00178.html
Bob
- coreutils v5.2.1 - stat.c, ThMO, 2005/09/26
- Re: coreutils v5.2.1 - stat.c, Bob Proulx, 2005/09/26
- Re3: coreutils v5.2.1 - stat.c, ThMO, 2005/09/29
- Re: Re3: coreutils v5.2.1 - stat.c, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/29
- Re4: coreutils v5.2.1 - stat.c, ThMO, 2005/09/29
- Re: Re4: coreutils v5.2.1 - stat.c, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/29
- coreutils man pages "info sort" -> "info coreutils sort", Paul Eggert, 2005/09/29
- Re: coreutils man pages "info sort" -> "info coreutils sort", Jim Meyering, 2005/09/29
- Re: coreutils man pages "info sort" -> "info coreutils sort", ThMO, 2005/09/29
- Re: coreutils man pages "info sort" -> "info coreutils sort", ThMO, 2005/09/29