Re: nohup definition should be changed

[Jim Meyering]

Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> Your message about nohup's problems had me nodding in agreement, as similar
> problems have happened to me.  Are there any objections to my
> installing this patch into GNU coreutils?
>
> 2005-05-12  Paul Eggert  <address@hidden>
>
>       * NEWS: nohup now closes stdin if it is a terminal, unless
>       POSIXLY_CORRECT is set.  This fixes a glitch noted by Wayne Pollock in
>       
> <https://www.opengroup.org/sophocles/show_mail.tpl?source=L&listname=austin-group-l&id=8341>.
>       * doc/coreutils.texi (nohup invocation): Document this.
>       * src/nohup.c (main): Implement this.

Fine by me.  Thanks to both of you.