[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 'cp -lL' behaviour conflicts with documentation
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: 'cp -lL' behaviour conflicts with documentation |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:14:01 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to Jim Meyering on 3/15/2005 10:35 AM:
>
> But the actual referent (as opposed to the symlink value) may be
> another symlink, which may point to another, etc. The final
> non-symlink value -- assuming there is one -- is the referent.
> It'd be easy if there were an flink syscall. Then
> you'd just open the symlink (which would open the referent)
> and use flink to create a hard link to the file behind
> the descriptor.
>
> Is it worth it to make cp manually follow a sequence of symlinks
> when given both -L and --link?
On a related matter, POSIX is a bit ambiguous about link utilities when
the source is a (nested) symlink. For link(1), it defers strictly to
link(2), which does not directly mention what to do if path1 is a symlink.
And for ln(1), step 3 states that link(2) should be called "using the
object that source_file references as the path1 argument", without saying
whether this must be the final referrent (or an error for broken links or
loops) or just a single dereference that might be another symlink.
Personally, I think that ln(1) should by default always try to resolve the
symlink down to a non-symlink file, and error out if that is not possible;
and that link(1) should be used to make hard links to symlinks on
architectures whose link(2) permit that. Maybe it is also worth adding -H
- -L and -P to ln to bypass my proposed default, at the same time as fixing
cp -lL.
At any rate, the following sequence is a bug in ln(1), because it does not
involve any of the above-mentioned ambiguities:
$ uname
CYGWIN_NT-5.1
$ touch a
$ ln -s a b
$ ln b c # Bug: c should be a hard link to a, not b
$ ls -l a b c
- -rw-r--r-- 1 eblake None 0 Mar 15 19:04 a
lrwxrwxrwx 2 eblake None 1 Mar 15 19:04 b -> a
lrwxrwxrwx 2 eblake None 1 Mar 15 19:04 c -> a
- --
Life is short - so eat dessert first!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCN5Zp84KuGfSFAYARAvauAJ9LNWYcbYUdTRM5R2gyl/O9aB0PXwCfV3JJ
OwbX0fTnpnDNolsx8R0bPA8=
=X51t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----