[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ls -l --no-total
|
From: |
Felipe Kellermann |
|
Subject: |
Re: ls -l --no-total |
|
Date: |
Sat, 19 Feb 2005 21:24:55 -0200 (BRDT) |
|
User-agent: |
Pine <http://www.washington.edu/pine/> |
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 6:37am +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Did I mention ls should have a --no-total option
> to remove those annoying
> total 1120
> without needing to pipe to a filter.
Another possibility would be to output the `total' to stderr.
--
Felipe Kellermann
- ls -l --no-total, Dan Jacobson, 2005/02/25
- Re: ls -l --no-total,
Felipe Kellermann <=
- Re: ls -l --no-total, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/02/25
- Re: ls -l --no-total, Felipe Kellermann, 2005/02/26
- Re: ls -l --no-total, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/02/26
- Re: ls -l --no-total, P, 2005/02/28
- Re: ls -l --no-total, James Youngman, 2005/02/28
- Re: ls -l --no-total, P, 2005/02/28