[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH][RFC] New 'true' program
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH][RFC] New 'true' program |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:07:52 +0100 |
>May one ask why you are so concerned about saving a few bytes?
I think it is an outrage that a simple task like returning a code
indicating success has to take more than a few bytes.
Well, that doesn't answer the question but shifts it. Why do you
consider it an "outrage" that it takes more than a few bytes?
Seriously, I'm quite curious because I cannot see how saving a few
bytes really matters to anyone, you won't notice that you gained those
few bytes on any disk that is bigger then 10Mb...
My /bin/true is exactly 92330 bytes by the way.
Cheers.
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] New 'true' program, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] New 'true' program, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/11/20
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] New 'true' program, Felipe W Damasio, 2004/11/21
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] New 'true' program, Paul Eggert, 2004/11/21
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] New 'true' program, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/11/21
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] New 'true' program, Felipe W Damasio, 2004/11/23
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] New 'true' program,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] New 'true' program, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez, 2004/11/23
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] New 'true' program, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/11/23
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] New 'true' program, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/11/23
Re: [PATCH][RFC] New 'true' program, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/11/20