[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: POSIX misunderstanding
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: POSIX misunderstanding |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:57:27 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Albert Cahalan <address@hidden> writes:
> It's no more legal or illegal than "head -42 foo".
"head -42 foo" is explicitly disallowed by the guidelines.
"head --lines 42 foo" is not. But we're veering from the main point.
> I'm bothering.
Thanks. (It's a thankless job, normally. :-)
> So, will you accept the opinion of the committee chair?
There's no rush. Let's wait until the standard is formally changed or
corrected, as I imagine it will be.
- POSIX misunderstanding, Albert Cahalan, 2004/08/17
- Re: POSIX misunderstanding, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/08/17
- Re: POSIX misunderstanding, Paul Eggert, 2004/08/18
- Re: POSIX misunderstanding, Albert Cahalan, 2004/08/18
- Re: POSIX misunderstanding, Paul Eggert, 2004/08/18
- Re: POSIX misunderstanding, Albert Cahalan, 2004/08/18
- Re: POSIX misunderstanding, Paul Eggert, 2004/08/18
- Re: POSIX misunderstanding, Albert Cahalan, 2004/08/19
- Re: POSIX misunderstanding, Paul Eggert, 2004/08/19
- Re: POSIX misunderstanding, Albert Cahalan, 2004/08/24
- Re: POSIX misunderstanding,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: POSIX misunderstanding, Albert Cahalan, 2004/08/26
- Re: POSIX misunderstanding, Paul Jarc, 2004/08/27
- Re: POSIX misunderstanding, Albert Cahalan, 2004/08/27
- Re: POSIX misunderstanding, Albert Cahalan, 2004/08/27
- Re: POSIX misunderstanding, Daniel Reed, 2004/08/28