[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct
From: |
Nathan Straz |
Subject: |
Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Apr 2004 17:02:24 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 05:03:58PM -0500, Andy Isaacson wrote:
> Linux-kernel: is this patch horribly wrong?
...
> to force O_DIRECT. The enclosed patch adds a "conv=direct" flag to
> enable this usage.
Adding the functionality to conv= doesn't seem right to me. conv= is
for converting the data in some way. This is just changing the way data
is written. Right?
Have you looked at lmdd? It supports O_DIRECT and many other things not
in the standard dd.
--
Nate Straz address@hidden
sgi, inc http://www.sgi.com/
Linux Test Project http://ltp.sf.net/
- Re: coreutils patch to align buffers better, (continued)
- Re: coreutils patch to align buffers better, Jim Meyering, 2004/04/15
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct, Paul Eggert, 2004/04/13
- Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct, Bryce, 2004/04/14
- Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct, Paul Eggert, 2004/04/14
- Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct, Jim Meyering, 2004/04/14
- Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct, Bryce, 2004/04/15
- Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct, Bryce, 2004/04/15
- Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct, Paul Eggert, 2004/04/07
- Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct, Andrew Morton, 2004/04/08
- Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct, Andy Isaacson, 2004/04/08
Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct,
Nathan Straz <=
Re: Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct, Paul Eggert, 2004/04/08