[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug in hostname
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: bug in hostname |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 18:44:15 +0100 |
> That means that you want me to do the work, I guess? OK, here's the program,
> consisting of
> - a patch to lib/gethostname.c to add Woe32 support,
> - a new src/hostname.c,
> - some autoconf macros that you can add to configure.ac or where it fits.
Thank you.
I've begun looking through these and like what I've seen.
However, I'd prefer to avoid providing short-named options
for --help and --version.
If we really want to fail for -s, -f, or -i when setting the hostname,
then it's best to give an additional diagnostic saying why.
But wouldn't it be better just to warn or ignore altogether?
> If that's OK, I can also go out and write the documentation update.
Great. Thanks again.
> (usage): Document new options -s, -f, -i, -h, -V.
- Re: bug in hostname, (continued)
- Re: bug in hostname, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/01/10
- Re: bug in hostname, Martin MOKREJŠ, 2004/01/21
- Re: bug in hostname, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/01/21
- Re: bug in hostname, Paul Jarc, 2004/01/21
- Re: bug in hostname, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/01/22
- Re: bug in hostname, Martin MOKREJŠ, 2004/01/29
- Re: bug in hostname, Paul Jarc, 2004/01/29
Re: bug in hostname, Bruno Haible, 2004/01/18
- Re: bug in hostname, Jim Meyering, 2004/01/17
- Re: bug in hostname, Bruno Haible, 2004/01/18
- Re: bug in hostname,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: bug in hostname, Bruno Haible, 2004/01/21
- Re: bug in hostname, Jim Meyering, 2004/01/21
- Re: bug in hostname, Bob Proulx, 2004/01/23
- Re: bug in hostname, Jim Meyering, 2004/01/23
- Re: bug in hostname, Bruno Haible, 2004/01/23
- Re: bug in hostname, Jim Meyering, 2004/01/23
- Re: bug in hostname, Bruno Haible, 2004/01/23
- Re: bug in hostname, Paul Jarc, 2004/01/23
- Re: bug in hostname, Bob Proulx, 2004/01/24
- Re: bug in hostname, Paul Jarc, 2004/01/24