Re: coreutils-5.1.0 build feedback

[Andreas Schwab]

Jim Meyering <address@hidden> writes:

> "Nelson H. F. Beebe" <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On DEC Alpha GNU/Linux, the coreutils-5.1.0 test suite had one failure:
>>
>> FAIL: fold
>
> Here's a patch for that one.
> This was due to the use of x2nrealloc with the address of an `int'
> as it's 2nd argument.  The problem shows up on systems where
> int and size_t have different sizes.

Here is another portability patch:

--- coreutils-5.1.0/src/stat.c.~1~      2003-11-05 04:46:47.000000000 +0100
+++ coreutils-5.1.0/src/stat.c  2004-01-08 14:37:44.000000000 +0100
@@ -308,9 +308,9 @@ human_fstype (STRUCT_STATVFS const *stat
     return (char *) type;
 
   {
-    static char buf[sizeof "UNKNOWN (0x%x)" - 2
+    static char buf[sizeof "UNKNOWN (0x%lx)" - 2
                    + 2 * sizeof (statfsbuf->f_type)];
-    sprintf (buf, "UNKNOWN (0x%x)", statfsbuf->f_type);
+    sprintf (buf, "UNKNOWN (0x%lx)", (unsigned long) statfsbuf->f_type);
     return buf;
   }
 #endif

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."