[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: antidote to date +%s not mentioned
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: antidote to date +%s not mentioned |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Jun 2003 09:36:12 +0200 |
Dan Jacobson <address@hidden> wrote:
> I know, on the info page that says
>
> `%s'
> seconds since the epoch, i.e., 1 January 1970 00:00:00 UTC (a GNU
>
> please add a Info-follow-reference right there, to your
>
> Jim> example showing how to do that:
>
> Jim> * If you're sorting or graphing dated data, your raw date values may
> Jim> be represented as seconds since the epoch. But few people can
>
> and, at the top where he starts talking about the antidote to %s,
> maybe put in this example:
>
> $ date
> Sun Jun 15 10:33:43 GMT-8 2003
> $ date -d "1970-01-01 $(date +%s) seconds"
> Sun Jun 15 02:33:43 GMT-8 2003
> $ date -d "1970-01-01 UTC $(date +%s) seconds"
> Sun Jun 15 10:33:43 GMT-8 2003
>
> as I think it gets the point across more directly maybe, about local
> time zones.
Thanks for all your good feedback.
I'm keeping it all for a rainy day (it never seems to rain here)
or until someone sends in a patch implementing the changes.