[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bison 1.28b
From: |
Axel Kittenberger |
Subject: |
Re: Bison 1.28b |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Aug 2001 20:42:26 +0200 |
> As for languages like C/C++, they admit that one adds #pragma directives,
> and it is often the case that most compiler options are available that way
> (but I do not know about GCC).
Not that I know of :o), but I don't know much about #prama's in c anyway :o)
Hey it's just an idea, nothing religious :o) I thought about like the
archive.tar.gz paradigm. In this case I know that I've to apply gzip on the
file and it will result to an archive.tar, then I know I've to apply tar on
it and I get the contens. 'grammar.c.y' would be ideological the same, I
would apply bison on it, getting grammar.c then I apply gcc on it getting my
object file. I think it would be a nice feature to have, since I guess in
this case most people secretly expect from 'file.ext.y' an 'file.ext' and not
something like grammar.c.tab.c
- Axel
- Re: Bison 1.28b, (continued)