Re: Off-by-one error in ld documentation

[Nick Clifton]

Hi Hans-Peter,

> Nicely, thanks.  While there's a point in keeping just one
> version for simplicity, the educational point of "here's what
> you may write which doesn't work, here's the semantically
> corrected code, and this is what you should have written in the
> first place" wins, IMHO.

Good.  I have checked in the documentation update.

Cheers
  Nick