bug-bash
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: multi-threaded compiling


From: alex xmb sw ratchev
Subject: Re: multi-threaded compiling
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 20:04:08 +0100

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024, 20:03 alex xmb sw ratchev <fxmbsw7@gmail.com> wrote:

> the logic between my code
>
> 1 threads_max
> 2 loop
> 3 inside loop , do if run is > than threads_max then wait -n one
> then 4 spawn thread
>

3 if run isnt more than max , simply ignore and spawn thread in next cmd

i dont get ur points
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024, 19:55 Mischa Baars <mjbaars1977.backup@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Sorry. I mean:
>>
>> for (( i=0; i<32; i++ )); do exit $i & done; for (( i=0; i<32; i++ )); do
>> wait -n; echo $?; done;
>>
>> doesn't function. With an ampersand instead of a semicolon. Why does it
>> function when called from a script and why does it fail when called from
>> the command line?
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 7:46 PM Mischa Baars <
>> mjbaars1977.backup@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> You mean:
>>>
>>> for (( i=0; i<32; i++ )); do exit $i & wait -n; echo $?; done;
>>>
>>> with one command and one wait in a single loop. And this does execute on
>>> the command line. How interesting!
>>>
>>> for (( i=0; i<32; i++ )); do exit $i; done; for (( i=0; i<32; i++ )); do
>>> wait -n; echo $?; done;
>>>
>>> Because this doesn't and to be honest, I needed the pid and its index to
>>> retrieve gcc's output from a log file array afterwards.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 7:25 PM alex xmb sw ratchev <fxmbsw7@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024, 19:22 Mischa Baars <mjbaars1977.backup@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 6:22 PM alex xmb sw ratchev <fxmbsw7@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> i also completly dont get ur issue
>>>>>>
>>>>>> f=( a.c b.c .. ) threads=$( nproc ) i=-1 r=
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   while [[ -v f[++i] ]] ; do
>>>>>>  (( ++r > threads )) &&
>>>>>> wait -n
>>>>>> gcc -c "${f[i]}" &
>>>>>>   done
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> How nice!
>>>>>
>>>>> wait -n exit 1 & echo $?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> doesnt need a pid
>>>> 1 : 1 as i wrote it , excepts add 'wait' as new last line
>>>>
>>>> You got me the solution :) Except that wait expects a pid after -n.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe
>>>>>
>>>>> for (( i=0; i<32; i++ )); do exit 1 & wait -n $!; echo $?; done;
>>>>>
>>>>> is what you meant? The equivalence of sequential execution?
>>>>>
>>>>> First think, then do magic.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024, 18:16 Mischa Baars <
>>>>>> mjbaars1977.backup@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello Paul,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It seems I'm awake a little longer than you are.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The second paragraph as you see it, belongs to 1)
>>>>>>> The fourth paragraph as you see it, belongs to 2)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The actual command invocations (a Makefile, a make.sh script) can be
>>>>>>> found
>>>>>>> in the attachment, as indicated on the first line of the mail. In the
>>>>>>> attachment there are two directories, one and two, belonging to 1)
>>>>>>> and 2)
>>>>>>> respectively.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not into Vulcan mindmelds, so I hope everything from the first
>>>>>>> mail
>>>>>>> makes sense to you and everyone on this mailing list now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Mischa Baars.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 5:01 PM Paul Smith <psmith@gnu.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > On Mon, 2024-03-11 at 09:56 +0100, Mischa Baars wrote:
>>>>>>> > > I've attached the problem. It consists of two parts:
>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>> > > 1) multi-threaded bash script and / or multi-threaded Makefile
>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>> > > Running bash script functions as expected, but executing the same
>>>>>>> > > line of code with make and / or the command line, does not
>>>>>>> function.
>>>>>>> > > Perhaps someone could explain to me why?
>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>> > > 2) passing a string argument from a bash script and / or
>>>>>>> Makefile to
>>>>>>> > > the gcc -D option
>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>> > > Running the makefile functions as expected, but I have not been
>>>>>>> able
>>>>>>> > > to get similar code to work from a bash script. Can someone
>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>> > > explain to me what I'm doing wrong?
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I don't understand the problem.  In the third paragraph above you
>>>>>>> say
>>>>>>> > the bash script works as expected and the makefile doesn't work,
>>>>>>> but in
>>>>>>> > the last paragraph you say that the makefile works as expected but
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>> > can't get it to work in bash.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Please provide actual command invocations (cut and pasted) showing
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> > output you received and explaining exactly what is wrong with it.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > But before you do that, be aware that make does NOT invoke
>>>>>>> /bin/bash as
>>>>>>> > its shell.  It invokes /bin/sh.  On some systems /bin/sh is
>>>>>>> actually an
>>>>>>> > alias for bash.  On other systems it isn't.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > If you want your makefile to always use bash as its shell, you
>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>> > add an explicit:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >     SHELL := /bin/bash
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > to your makefile to force it.  Maybe that will solve your
>>>>>>> problem.  If
>>>>>>> > not we'll need details such as I mention above.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]