[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: wait -n misses signaled subprocess
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: wait -n misses signaled subprocess |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:41:56 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 1/30/24 4:28 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
It's not a bug, bash has allowed multiple waits for the same pid for
decades. bash works the way posix says it should for wait (without -n)
in posix mode.
I think this is a bug in bash posix mode, actually. `wait -n' should
remove the job completely, since it's been `successfully waited for'
and the language you quoted came out of interp 1254 and will be in the
next revision.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: wait -n misses signaled subprocess, (continued)
- Re: wait -n misses signaled subprocess, Chet Ramey, 2024/01/30
- Re: wait -n misses signaled subprocess, Steven Pelley, 2024/01/30
- Re: wait -n misses signaled subprocess, Chet Ramey, 2024/01/30
- Re: wait -n misses signaled subprocess, Steven Pelley, 2024/01/30
- Re: wait -n misses signaled subprocess, Steven Pelley, 2024/01/30
- Re: wait -n misses signaled subprocess, Chet Ramey, 2024/01/30
- Re: wait -n misses signaled subprocess, Robert Elz, 2024/01/30
- Re: wait -n misses signaled subprocess, Chet Ramey, 2024/01/30
- Re: wait -n misses signaled subprocess,
Chet Ramey <=
Re: wait -n misses signaled subprocess, Robert Elz, 2024/01/29
Re: wait -n misses signaled subprocess, Robert Elz, 2024/01/29