Re: math operations with base#prefix

[alex xmb ratchev]

On Tue, Sep 19, 2023, 22:20 Kerin Millar <kfm@plushkava.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 22:08:25 +0200
> alex xmb ratchev <fxmbsw7@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > so u mean a $ sign requirement ?
>
> For dereferencing variable identifiers in base#n notation, yes.
>
> > i didnt get the base values , i tried simple one
> > i faced the ' without $ it doesnt work '
>
> I don't fully understand this sentence. Anyway, it works as described in
> the manual.
>
> >
> > This is what matters. The implied complaint is that the $ symbols have to
> > > be there and that they should somehow be optional. In other words,
> Victor
> > > wants for "res = 10#res1 + 10#res2" to be able to consider res1 and
> res2
> >
> >
> > optional as in make default values in if empty ?
>
> No. Victor wants for, say, "10#res1" to consider res1 as an identifier,
> instead of a number. I can't know how it could be stated any more clearly.
>

ah i see , .. no what i meant .. thx .. peace
a minor idea , they can write this as they want , but gotta parse down for
math use

-- 
> Kerin Millar
>