Re: hash -d 0/1 and other hash stuff

[Chet Ramey]

On 9/14/23 3:20 PM, Mike Jonkmans wrote:

> > > Nowhere is this prioritization mentioned.
> > > I don't think that any option should be ignored.
> > > Nor should ambiguous commands be executed.
> > I think it's better to do something useful.
>
> I offered to write a patch. So I needed to find out, what you would accept.
> But back to usefulness it is.

I added a sentence to the man page and info file describing the
precedence.

--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
                 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/