Re: problem anomalies , possibly aliases related

[alex xmb ratchev]

On Fri, Jul 21, 2023, 1:36 PM Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 01:15:16PM +0200, alex xmb ratchev wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023, 8:09 PM Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 12:33:07AM +1000, Martin D Kealey wrote:
> [...]
> > > Well in any case, the behavior you wanted is not reliable across
> shells,
> > > nor even across versions of bash.
> > >
> >
> > me ?
>
> I was replying to Martin Kealey.  "You" in that sentence referred to him.
>

ah k , thxx

> i dont have interest in supporting not newest versions ... 4.4 ? uh
> > not my case , nor would i support it
>
> The "non-local break/continue" that Martin wanted doesn't work in 5.2
> either.
>
>
> > > unicorn:~$ bash-4.4 foo
> > > 1
> > > f
> > > foo: line 1: break: only meaningful in a `for', `while', or `until'
> loop
> > > 2
> > > f
> > > foo: line 1: break: only meaningful in a `for', `while', or `until'
> loop
> > > 3
> > > f
> > > foo: line 1: break: only meaningful in a `for', `while', or `until'
> loop
>
> unicorn:~$ bash-5.2 foo
> 1
> f
> foo: line 1: break: only meaningful in a `for', `while', or `until' loop
> 2
> f
> foo: line 1: break: only meaningful in a `for', `while', or `until' loop
> 3
> f
> foo: line 1: break: only meaningful in a `for', `while', or `until' loop
>
>
> I used 4.3 and 4.4 in my demonstration because that was where the
> behavior changed.  Everything *before* 4.3 presumably works like 4.3,
> and everything *after* 4.4 presumably works like 4.4, though I didn't
> test all the versions.  Only a tiny handful.
>
> I showed exactly how I ran my demonstration, so you could have repeated
> it using your own bash version to see whether it supported the non-local
> break/continue.
>
> But I guess now you don't have to, since I just did it for you.
>

cool =))

>