[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'...
From: |
Ángel |
Subject: |
Re: Use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'... |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Jan 2021 01:46:50 +0100 |
On 2021-01-17 at 15:33 -0500, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 1/15/21 4:00 PM, Ángel wrote:
> > On 2021-01-15 at 10:00 -0500, Chet Ramey wrote:
> > > On 1/14/21 11:45 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > > > Hi Everyone,
> > > >
> > > > I'm building Bash 5.1 from sources. This may be of interest:
> > > >
> > > > /usr/bin/ld: ./lib/sh/libsh.a(tmpfile.o): in function
> > > > `sh_mktmpname':
> > > > /home/jwalton/Build-Scripts/bash-5.1/lib/sh/tmpfile.c:160: warning:
> > > > the use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp' or `mkdtemp'
> > >
> > > It's a spurious warning.
> >
> > [Explanation of when is mktemp() used and patch to remove the
> > warning]
>
> The warning can be ignored.
Sure. However, actually removing the spurious warning would not only
make (some) build systems happier, but also produce less confused
users, so it seemed (potentially) valuable.
Best regards
- Use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'..., Jeffrey Walton, 2021/01/14
- Re: Use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'..., Eli Schwartz, 2021/01/14
- Re: Use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'..., Chet Ramey, 2021/01/15
- Re: Use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'..., Ángel, 2021/01/15
- Re: Use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'..., Chet Ramey, 2021/01/17
- Re: Use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'...,
Ángel <=
- Re: Use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'..., Chet Ramey, 2021/01/18
- Re: Use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'..., Ángel, 2021/01/18