[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Arithmetic evaluation of negative numbers with base prefix
From: |
Greg Wooledge |
Subject: |
Re: Arithmetic evaluation of negative numbers with base prefix |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jun 2019 11:47:08 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 02:30:27PM +0100, Jeremy Townshend wrote:
> In the meantime it would seem cautionary to advise against the pitfall of
> using base# prefixed to variables (contrary to
> mywiki.wooledge.org/ArithmeticExpression) unless you can be confident that
> they will never be decremented below zero.
Fair point. I've updated <https://mywiki.wooledge.org/ArithmeticExpression>
and <https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashPitfalls>.
- Arithmetic evaluation of negative numbers with base prefix, Jeremy Townshend, 2019/06/14
- Re: Arithmetic evaluation of negative numbers with base prefix, Chet Ramey, 2019/06/14
- Re: Arithmetic evaluation of negative numbers with base prefix, Jeremy Townshend, 2019/06/17
- Re: Arithmetic evaluation of negative numbers with base prefix,
Greg Wooledge <=
- Re: Arithmetic evaluation of negative numbers with base prefix, Ilkka Virta, 2019/06/18
- Re: Arithmetic evaluation of negative numbers with base prefix, Chet Ramey, 2019/06/18
- Re: Arithmetic evaluation of negative numbers with base prefix, Greg Wooledge, 2019/06/18
- Re: Arithmetic evaluation of negative numbers with base prefix, Ilkka Virta, 2019/06/18
- Re: Arithmetic evaluation of negative numbers with base prefix, Chet Ramey, 2019/06/19
- Re: Arithmetic evaluation of negative numbers with base prefix, Chet Ramey, 2019/06/19
- Re: Arithmetic evaluation of negative numbers with base prefix, Chet Ramey, 2019/06/19
Re: Arithmetic evaluation of negative numbers with base prefix, Ilkka Virta, 2019/06/14